It documents software that generates adult material. Nothing on the site is explicit, but the subject is, and
the pages are written for adults deciding what to pay for.
Entering confirms you are at least 18, that adult material is lawful where you are, and that you have read the
content policy.
A summary of what the statutes in this area actually address, written so it can be checked. It is not legal
advice and it cannot be: the position turns on where you are and what you did with the file.
The two lines that are absolute
Generating, publishing, transmitting
Outside those two categories, the statutes are mostly about what leaves your device. Publication, distribution,
transmission and sale are the acts named; private generation is usually not addressed at all. That distinction
explains why a market can simultaneously block every site in this category and have no provision covering a
person generating something privately.
It also explains why operators in this category are more exposed than their users, and why platform policies
are often stricter than local law. An operator must satisfy payment processors, hosts and several regulators at
once; the strictest of those sets the rules you will actually encounter.
The four markets in this catalogue
What is addressed, per market. Links go to the statute.
Market
Instrument
What it addresses
United States
State statutes, federal obscenity law
Varies by state; non-consensual synthetic imagery criminalised in most
Distribution of obscene content; state Sharia law may apply separately
Each language branch repeats the relevant notice in its own language: 한국어,
Bahasa Melayu, India.
Questions about the legal position
Does generating something privately carry the same risk as sharing it?
Almost never the same, and the gap is the single most useful thing to understand here. Most statutes in this area attack distribution, publication or transmission. Two categories are exceptions and are treated as offences regardless of whether anything was shared: material depicting minors, and sexual material made from an identifiable person without consent.
What changed recently?
Non-consensual synthetic sexual imagery moved from a civil matter to a criminal one across much of the English-speaking world and in South Korea, and platform-level age assurance became a legal requirement in several jurisdictions rather than a policy choice. Both changes affect which tools can operate rather than what a private user may generate.
Is a VPN a solution to a blocked site?
It is a way around a network block, not a change in legal position. Where distribution of this material is an offence, routing around an ISP does not alter that, and in some jurisdictions circumvention is itself addressed. This page states where the law sits; it is not advice about getting past it.